Compare

General G-MAX AS-07 vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires

Last updated 7/09/2024 - Originally published 7/09/2024
Written by SimpleTire

General was introduced in 1915 in Akron, Ohio, and manufactures tires for sedans, coupes, CUVs, SUVs, minivans, Jeeps, light trucks, racing cars, and commercial vehicles. It offers tires in various categories, which include all-season, all-terrain, UHP all-season, winter, UHP summer, all-weather, mud-terrain, and performance.

Yokohama, on the other hand, was founded in 1917 in Tokyo, and makes tires for passenger cars, light trucks, CUVs, SUVs, and commercial vehicles. The range of Yokohama tires is offered in various categories, which include all-season, UHP, all-terrain, mud-terrain, UHP all-season, UHP summer, highway, winter, performance, all-weather, sport, racing, and commercial van.

These tire manufacturers are known for their advanced technologies and innovative tread designs, and they dedicate a lot of time, effort, and research to deliver outstanding products that perform better on the roads. The General G-MAX AS-07 and the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus are the two popular UHP all-season tires offered by these manufacturers and are made for use on passenger cars, CUVs, and light trucks.

If you’re willing to buy one of these tires to experience exceptional performance year-round and wish to enjoy sharp steering response, enhanced high-speed control, and improved stability, this General G-MAX AS-07 vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires comparison is for you.

As we have utilized our advanced tire rating SimpleScore, comparing these tires will give you a transparent analysis of the performance of the tires in areas like traction, handling, and longevity.

General G-MAX AS-07 tires

Introduced in August 2023, the General G-MAX AS-07 is an Ultra-High-Performance (UHP), all-season tire that’s made for use on passenger cars, CUVs, light trucks, and SUVs, and offers drivers dependable wet and dry braking performance, improved snow traction, quieter rides, and long-lasting treadwear. Offered in 16- to 23-inch rim sizes, the tire is compatible with a wider range of vehicles on the market. Additionally, there is an attractive tread life warranty coverage offered by the manufacturers. The asymmetric tread pattern of the tire is optimized for impressive performance year-round, providing the drivers with the required extra control.

Overall, the G-MAX AS-07 scores a great 8.7 SimpleScore rating because of its longer tread life, better handling, and dependable year-round traction.

Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires

Launched in October 2019, the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus features an advanced asymmetric tread design with various tread elements contributing to a better performance. The Advan Sport A/S Plus is good for use on passenger and performance cars and ensures year-round service. Whether it is handling, braking, ride control, or stability, this UHP all-season tire can do it all with the offered features and technologies. The availability of this tire in 16- to 21-inch rim sizes makes it suitable for a wide range of tires. Likewise, there is a better tread life warranty offering than its counterpart.

Overall, the Advan Sport A/S Plus receives an admirable 8.8 SimpleScore rating, thanks to its better traction performance, sharp handling response, and extended tread life.

General G-MAX AS-07 vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on traction

To provide the right amount of performance and turn the torque into a calibrating ride, the traction performance of a UHP all-season mustn't be compromised. When we compared the traction scores of the G-MAX tires and the Advan Sport tires, we found that the difference in their scores was very minimal.

Starting with the G-MAX AS-07, the tire scores a great 8.6 out of 10 SimpleScore rating in traction and features an advanced asymmetric tread design that has four circumferential grooves to resist hydroplaning and increase wet traction performance. Similarly, a good number of cuts and sipes across the tire boost traction performance in wet and light snow conditions, while the all-season tread compound maintains contact with the surfaces for increased traction in changing weather conditions. Additionally, the flat and wider contact patch of the tire also helps in increased surefootedness for better grip and improves surface-biting ability.

Contrarily, the Advan Sport A/S Plus scores a slightly higher 8.8 SimpleScore in traction. Its advanced all-season HS-2 compound sports high-grade silica and advanced polymers for better grip in wet and light wintry conditions. The Z-shaped grooves and the sipes across the tread provide that extra biting ability for increased traction in wet and wintry weather. The four circumferential grooves on the tread facilitate water dispersion for increased wet grip and hydroplaning resistance. It holds better contact with the surface because of various detailed elements and assures improved year-round traction performance in dry, wet, and light snow conditions.

Traction was the area, wherein the Advan Sport A/S Plus tires were better than the G-MAX AS-07 tires.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus

General G-MAX AS-07 vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on handling

The handling performance of ultra-high-performance all-season tires needs to commanding as it can relate to things like high-speed stability, cornering, steering, and acceleration. Interestingly, both tires looked competitive in this area.

The G-MAX AS-07 secures an 8.7 SimpleScore in handling, indicating the tire is reasonably good on the ride control front. The wider profile allows a larger area to come in contact with the surface, ensuring improved control when the tire is driven at high speeds. Likewise, the solid shoulders assist in maintaining high-speed pressures by keeping the shape of the profile intact. The all-season compound along with sipes and ribs allows the G-MAX AS-07 to offer improved steering response and boost lane-changing ability in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions.

On the other hand, the Advan Sport A/S tire also scores an equal 8.7 SimpleScore rating in handling, giving tough competition to the peer in this area. Its extra-large shoulder blocks enhance cornering, while the tough sidewall construction assists in keeping the tire in the right shape for seamless handling. The silica-rich HS-2 all-season compound allows the drivers to stop the vehicle right on time in wet and wintry conditions, while the wider contact patch provides better ride control at high speed and enhances steering response.

Handling was the area where both tires looked adequately appropriate and scored equal, making the competition tough.

ADVANTAGE: Tie

General G-MAX AS-07 vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on longevity

Longevity is important for any tire buyer, irrespective of the tire type. This is because longevity relates to how long a tire will last. When it comes to UHP all-season tires like the G-MAX AS-07 and the Advan Sport A/S Plus that handle high-speed driving pressures and are used year-round, the long-lasting factor becomes very important during tire selection.

Commencing with the General UHP all-season tires discussed in this comparison, we found that the SimpleScore in longevity was 8.9, assuring that it can offer a longer service and resist faster wear. Both, the inner and outer construction of the tire is engineered to resist wear. While the reinforced plies and steel belts keep the tire in shape to avoid chances of uneven wear, the solid rubber compound resists driving pressures for extended service. Additionally, the G-MAX AS-07 is backed by a 50,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, which means it is optimized to last longer.

Comparatively, the Advan Sport A/S Plus scores an outstanding 9.1 SimpleScore rating in longevity. The higher score in longevity indicates that the tire lasts longer than the peer. It features a flatter contour profile that distributes driving pressures to offer an even and longer wear. The HS-2 compound also contributes to slowing the tire’s wear rate. Additionally, it comes with a 55,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty for front-position staggered and non-staggered fitments, while its rear-position staggered fitment variations come with a 27,500-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty. The great warranty offering signifies the tire’s extended usability.

In the longevity area, we found the Yokohama tires were better than General tires and scored a higher rating.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus

When to use each

Both, the G-MAX AS-07 and the Advan Sport A/S Plus tires fall in the ultra-high-performance (UHP) all-season category and therefore, they can be used year-round to achieve high-speed handling, sharp steering response, confident cornering, in-time braking, and quick lane-changing. These tires are good for use in dry, wet, or light winter weather conditions, however, they aren’t Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified and shouldn’t be used in temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit, or on roads covered with thick snow or ice. In addition, they are made for use on paved roads and therefore, shouldn’t be considered for off-road driving.

Which one should you choose?

When we compared the overall SimpleScores of both tires, we found that the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus was slightly ahead of the General G-MAX AS-07 with an overall score of 8.8 vs 8.7. However, these tires are slightly different from each other and have their own advantages, which must be taken into consideration before making a purchase.

When it comes to pricing, the G-MAX AS-07 is available at a starting price of at least $111.99 per tire, while the Advan Sport A/S Plus comes at a starting price of at least $135.99 per tire. This means that a set of four G-MAX AS-07 tires will cost you at least $447.96, while a set of four Advan Sport A/S Plus tires will cost you at least $543.96.

Based on SimpleScore, you should choose the General G-MAX AS-07 if you:

  • Drive a high-end sports car like the Porsche 911, a mid-size luxury car like the Mercedes-Benz E-Class, or a luxury sedan like the Infiniti Q50.
  • Need UHP all-season tires that offer equally good handling performance like its peer (8.7 vs 8.7).
  • Need more affordable tires.
  • Need tires that come with equal warranty offerings for all sizes.

Conversely, you should consider the Advan Sport A/S Plus if you:

  • Drive an older convertible like the Mercedes-Benz SL500, a performance-oriented hatchback like the Volkswagen Golf GTI, or a sports car Chevrolet Corvette.
  • Need tires that offer better traction performance (8.8 vs 8.6)
  • Need long-lasting tires (9.1 vs 8.9)
  • Need tires that do not disappoint even on the handling front (8.7 vs 8.7)
  • Need tires have better warranty coverage for front-position staggered and non-staggered fitments
  • Are comfortable paying extra to own a slightly better tire

The G-MAX AS-07 vs Advan Sport A/S Plus tires look like a great comparison as both tires score almost similar ratings. But, your decision to buy either of these tires should depend on your vehicle type, budget, driving needs, and preferences in areas like traction, handling, and longevity.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By