Compare

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires

Last updated 7/09/2024 - Originally published 7/09/2024
Written by SimpleTire

Founded in 1871 in Germany, Continental is known for its new-age tires that represent advanced technologies and come with many innovative features. The tire brand has a reputation in the tire market as one of the premium tire manufacturers and makes tires for passenger cars, CUVs, SUVs, light trucks, commercial vehicles, farm equipment, and industrial applications.

On the other hand, Hankook has been a noteworthy tire manufacturer since the 1940s and is based in South Korea. It makes tires for passenger cars, CUVs, SUVs, light trucks, EVs, trailers, and commercial vehicles. Hankook’s passenger tires are featured on vehicles offered by top-rated vehicle manufacturers and its diversified line of tire families is well-received in the American tire market by enthusiasts and daily drivers.

The TrueContact Tour tires and Kinergy PT (H737) tires are the two great touring all-season tires from these tire manufacturers and are built and engineered for longer service and year-round performance. Undoubtedly, these two manufacturers, at their own scale put in a ton of effort and research to make their tires achieve great results, and similar is the case with the TrueContact and the Kinergy PT (H737) tires that are loaded with diversified features and state-of-the-art technologies.

If you’re planning to buy either of these tires and want to know which one should you consider, then read our Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires comparison, wherein we have analyzed their respective traction, handling, and longevity performances based on SimpleScore and tried to understand where each tire stands.

Continental TrueContact Tour tires

Introduced in June 2018 and made for use on passenger cars, CUVs, SUVs, and minivans, the Continental TrueContact Tour is a great all-season touring tire that sports the manufacturer’s advanced engineering and cutting-edge tire technologies. The tire is optimized for use in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions and features a symmetrical tread design to provide a greater balance between longevity and performance. The TrueContact Tour also comes with features and technologies to improve braking performance in wet conditions, increase fuel efficiency, reduce tread noise levels, and provide solid year-round traction.

Overall, the TrueContact achieves an impressive 8.9 SimpleScore rating on a scale of 10, thanks to its long-lasting tread life, dependable traction, and great handling performance.

Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires

Launched in September 2018, the Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) is also a great touring all-season tire suitable for use on sedans, coupes, CUVs, and SUVs, and is loaded with many great features that enhance durability, longevity, handling response, and year-round traction performance. Like its competitor, the Kinergy tire also comes with a great ability to serve in dry, wet, and light winter weather and utilizes multiple technologies to enhance driving performance in many different areas. The asymmetric tread design and optimized all-season rubber compound are also tuned for a solid performance.

Overall, the Kinergy PT (H737) scores a great 8.8 SimpleScore rating because of exceptional tread life, better traction performance, and responsive handling.

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires on traction

Traction is an important factor when buying tires and is even more crucial for all-season tires used in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions. When we compared the traction scores of both tires we found a very slight difference and both tires competed well in this area.

Commencing with the TrueContact Tour, the tire scores an 8.7 SimpleScore rating on a scale of 10 in the traction area. This score hints that the tire is good at offering year-round traction, in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions. The tread features an advanced symmetrical pattern and has detailed sipes that provide a commanding grip in wet conditions. The three circumferential grooves present on the tread force water out of the footprint to prevent hydroplaning and boost wet weather traction. The detailed sipes on the shoulder and center ribs also increase the tire’s ability to perform in wet and light snow conditions. Additionally, the shoulder edges increase traction performance on dry roads.

On the other hand, the Kinergy PT (H737) secures an 8.6 SimpleScore rating in traction. The wide circumferential out grooves of this tire maximize water evacuation for increased wet traction, while the optimized asymmetric tread pattern and all-season rubber compound ensure increased grip in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions. The high stiffness on the center rib improves dry performance and the tie bar applied to the closed lateral grooves also offers confident driving in dry conditions. Additionally, the wide lateral grooves improve performance in snow conditions.

No doubt, both tires are great when it comes to traction performance, but it was the Continental tire that surpassed the Kinergy PT (H737).

ADVANTAGE: Continental TrueContact Tour

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires on handling

For a great control and steering response, the tire’s handling performance must be on the positive side. When we compared the handling scores of the TrueContact Tour and the Kinergy PT (H737), both tires challenged each other equally.

The TrueContact Tour scored an 8.6 SimpleScore in handling, assuring the drivers that the tire can offer great steering response and ride control. While the innovative tread pattern boosts braking ability, the tread also features detailed elements for extra control and stopping ability in wet and light snow conditions. The tread also features deeper grooves and sharp shoulder edges to maintain extra surefootedness in light snow conditions. The wider footprint of the tire also enhances steering response and cornering performance. Additionally, the dual center ribs ease lane-changing while driving on the highways.

Coming to the Kinergy PT (H737), the tire scores an 8.6 SimpleScore rating on the handling front, indicating that it is equally strong when it comes to controllability and steering response. The optimized tread block stiffness and tread uniformity improve handling performance. The use of ProMileage Technology maximizes road contact and evenly distributes driving forces while acceleration, cornering, and braking. The asymmetric pattern design with enhanced outside stiffness also improves handling and cornering performance. Additionally, the tie bar applied to the closed lateral grooves, high stiffness center rib, and enhanced sidewall stiffness increase dry handling, tracking performance, and steering ability.

On the handling part, we found both the TrueContact Tour and the Kinergy PT (H737) to be equally good, resulting in a tie!

ADVANTAGE: Tie

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy PT (H737) tires on longevity

Everyone wishes to buy tires that last longer and wear slowly. Long-lasting was the area wherein we found both tires to be outstanding, however, there was a very slight difference in their scores, which declared one as the winner in longevity.

The TrueContact scored an excellent 9.5 SimpleScore rating in longevity. This means the tire is optimized for longer service and has many great features and technologies to control the tread wear rate. The tire is backed by an 80,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, which reveals that the tire is optimized for long-lasting use. Additionally, the EcoPlus Technology also contributes to not only increasing fuel efficiency but also improving the tread life. Likewise, the QuickView Indicators allow drivers to visually check how much tread is left to provide a dependable service. Additionally, the reinforced inner construction keeps the tire in shape and assures even wear.

The Kinergy PT (H737) also scored an exceptional 9.3 SimpleScore rating in the longevity area. This means even these tires would not disappoint you with the tread life and would last longer. While the optimized block stiffness enhances durability for increased mileage, the durable compound also contributes to reducing the tread wear rate. Features like belt edge tape folding and rim cushion sheet also increase tread life. In addition, the optimized profile design with computer-added simulation also controls tread wear. The Kinergy PT (H737) surprises with a whopping 90,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.

When we compared the scores of both tires in longevity, the TrueContact Tour tires were slightly better. However, the Kinergy PT (H737) tires didn’t fail to impress with their higher tread life warranty.

ADVANTAGE: Continental TrueContact Tour

When to use each

Both, the TrueContact Tour and the Kinergy PT (H737) belong to the all-season tire category and are good for use in dry, wet, and light snow conditions. But, they aren’t Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified and shouldn’t be used in temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit on roads covered with thick layers of snow or ice.

The Continental tires discussed here are good for use on passenger cars, minivans, small SUVs, and CUVs with rim sizes varying between 15- to 19-inch. Contrarily, the Hankook tires are good for use on sedans, SUVs, CUVs, and coupes with similar rim sizes falling between 15- to 19-inch.

Which one should you choose?

Looking at the overall SimpleScore of both tires, the TrueContact Tour was slightly ahead with a score of 8.9 compared to the 8.8 SimpleScore of the Kinergy PT (H737).

It must be noted that these tires vary in many different areas and their strengths should be considered when you make a purchase. Each tire’s performance in areas like longevity, traction, and handling must be analyzed and compared with your driving preferences and needs. Additionally, things like budget, warranty, and brand preference also play a key role in helping you to decide the right tire for your vehicle.

As far as the pricing is concerned, the TrueContact Tour is offered at a starting price of at least $122.99 per tire, while the Kinergy PT (H737) is available at a starting price of at least $103.99 per tire. This means a set of four Continental tires will cost you at least $491.96, while a set of four Hankook tires will cost you at least $415.96.

Based on SimpleScore, you must consider the TrueContact Tour if you:

  • Drive a mid-size executive sedan like the Lexus ES300h, a minivan like the Toyota Sienna, a subcompact SUV like the Subaru Crosstrek, or a CUV like the Volkswagen Tiguan.
  • Need a tire that offers a longer tread life (9.5 vs 9.3 in longevity).
  • Want a tire that is better on the traction front (8.7 vs 8.6 in traction).
  • Need a tire that doesn’t disappoint with handling
  • Are comfortable paying extra to own a better tire

On the other hand, you should choose the Kinergy PT (H737) if you:

  • Drive a mid-size sedan like the Honda Accord, a CUV like the Toyota RAV4, or a compact SUV like the Jeep Patriot.
  • Need a tire that offers competitive handling performance.
  • Need a tire that has better tread life warranty coverage.
  • Need a good-performing but more affordable tire.

At first look, the TrueContact Tour vs Kinergy PT (H737) tires comparison looks unfair, but when you compare their scores and analyze the capabilities you find out that the Hankook tires very well compete against the premium Continental tires.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By