Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 vs Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires

Geolandar vs Dynapro: Which all-season tire is best?

Yokohama is a Japanese tire manufacturer with over a century of expertise in making tires. The tire manufacturer utilizes advanced engineering and top-quality materials to make tires that offer dependable service. Yokohama highway-terrain tires are known for their balanced control, quieter rides, and heavy-duty towing and fit the needs of CUVs, SUVs, light trucks, and work vans.

Hankook, on the other hand, was founded in 1941 in South Korea and now stands among the most dependable manufacturers in the world, thanks to its technological innovations and solid-performing tires. Hankook’s highway-terrain tires are considered by most manufacturers as their original equipment (O.E.) choices for their pickup trucks and SUVs. All thanks to the advanced engineering, long-lasting tread, and reliable year-round performance, Hankook’s highway tires provide the much-needed confidence. Coming from both tire manufacturers, the Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 and the Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) are the two capable highway-terrain all-season tires picked for the comparison. While the Geolandar H/T4 is a high-tech highway-terrain choice for drivers seeking smooth, quiet rides alongside solid payload strength, the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) is a dependable highway touring all-season that specializes in long-lasting tread life, impressive light snow and wet traction, and stable and comfortable highway rides.

If you need a reliable set of highway-terrain all-season tires, this Geolandar H/T4 vs Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires comparison will help you pick the better tire based on your driving needs, preferences, and budget. The overall comparative analysis, along with a head-to-head comparison of traction, handling, and longevity performance of these tires based on our proprietary tire rating system, SimpleScore, will further help you choose the better tire out of the two. Read on!

Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 tires

First, let’s talk about the Yokohama Geolandar H/T4, a solid highway-terrain tire suitable for year-round use in dry, wet, and light winter weather. The tire is built for use on CUVs, SUVs, and light trucks, and specially optimized for enhanced strength and toughness to withstand heavy hauling and offer quieter rides, solid year-round traction, hydroplaning resistance, and long-lasting tread life.

Overall, the Geolandar H/T4 achieves a great 8.9 SimpleScore, backed by its near-perfect longevity, reliable year-round traction, and confident handling.

Get Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires

The Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) can be used on CUVs, SUVs, and light trucks, and is tuned for long-distance hauling, solid year-round traction, crisp steering response, increased durability, enhanced ride comfort, and low tread noise levels. This tread features many innovative features to boost braking performance, increase surface grip, and provide confident grip year-round. Plus, the tread life warranty backing makes it a value-for-money choice in the highway-terrain league.

Overall, the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) secures a great 8.6 SimpleScore, thanks to its long-lasting tread life, strong traction, and crisp highway handling.

Get Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 vs Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires on traction

With the overviews of both highway tires covered, let’s analyze their traction performance to find out which tire leads when it comes to maintaining grip year-round.

Commencing with the Geolandar H/T4, the tire secures a solid 8.5 SimpleScore for its dependable year-round traction in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. It comes with an optimized tread pattern, featuring large center blocks with dual lug grooves for solid grip on highways. There are triple 3D sipes for increased surefootedness on wet roads, and the presence of wide circumferential grooves channels water away from the contact patch to prevent hydroplaning.

Contrarily, the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) secures a great 8.4 SimpleScore in traction, assuring competitive grip year-round. The tire sports multiple sipes and deep lateral shoulder slots for increased surface-biting ability in wet and light winter conditions. There are four longitudinal grooves that force water away from the contact patch and offer solid wet grip while reducing chances of hydroplaning. Additionally, the rubber compound is optimized for better traction and grip throughout the year.

While both highway-terrain tires provide reliable traction and grip, the Geolandar H/T4 excels by a small margin.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar H/T4

Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 vs Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires on handling

Let us now find out which of the two tires is better in handling and provides better ride control, steering response, stability, braking performance, and cornering year-round.

The Geolandar H/T4 achieves an 8.4 SimpleScore for its reliable handling performance. The robust shoulder blocks in the outer area keep the tread in the right shape for confident cornering. Block squirm is controlled by the presence of triple 3D sipes, which offer better traction and grounded center feel in case of towing trailers. Likewise, these sipes along with sharper block edges boost braking performance for timely stopping. Additionally, the multi-pitch tread sequencing offers quieter and smoother rides.

On the other hand, the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) earns a competitive 8.3 SimpleScore in handling. There are multiple sipes to provide solid control on mild snowy roads, and the solid center rib offers great on-center steering feedback. The footprint is tuned for great highway stability, which is also boosted through its optimized rubber compound. There are block tie-bars that prevent flexing during lane changes, and the close-end lateral grooves along with optimized multi-pitch sequencing assure quieter and more comfortable rides.

In the handling race, the Geolandar H/T4 again leads with a marginal victory and beats the Dynapro HT2 (RH15).

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar H/T4

Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 vs Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tires on longevity

Now, let’s move on to analyzing the long-lasting ability of the tires and find out which one excels when it comes to controlling wear and covering more miles. This time, the gap in the scores was significant.

Starting with the Geolandar H/T4, the tire stuns in the long-lasting part and achieves a near-perfect 9.9 SimpleScore. All thanks to its strong and durable construction that allows it to resist wear. The tire is also backed by an up to 70,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, confirming its great ability to resist wear. The flat footprint of the tire is additionally tuned to control uneven wear for an exceptional wear life.

Comparatively, the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) scores an excellent 9.1 in longevity, ensuring an impressive service life. The tire is covered by an up to 70,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, further attesting to the tire’s long-lasting ability. The flat and wide footprint of this Hankook tire, along with an optimized block pattern, contributes to preventing uneven wear.

As we can see with the scores, even in longevity, the Geolandar H/T4 claims a clear victory with a whopping 9.9 rating and slightly better capabilities.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar H/T4

When to use each

Both the Geolandar H/T4 and the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) are engineered for highway driving purposes and feature an all-season rubber compound that ensures dependable performance on dry streets, wet highways, and light winter slush. They can also be considered if you seek tires that provide a smooth and vibration-free highway driving experience with controlled tread noise levels.

However, it is to be noted that neither tire is Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certified, which means they should not be used in moderate to severe winter weather or in temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit. As far as rim sizes are concerned, both the Geolandar H/T4 and the Dynapro HT2 tires are available in 15- to 22-inch rim choices.

Which one should you choose?

Based on overall SimpleScores, the Geolandar H/T4 is a better choice than the Dynapro HT2 (RH14) (8.9 vs 8.6). However, your decision to buy tires should be based on your driving style, budget, and preferences.

Talking about prices, the Geolandar H/T4 is available at a starting price of at least $150 per tire, which means a set of four would cost you at least $600. On the other hand, a single Dynapro HT2 (RH14) tire would cost you at least $154, which combines the starting price for a set of four to at least $616.

Looking at SimpleScore, choose the Yokohama Geolandar H/T4 if you:

• Drive a full-size SUV or truck like the Ford Expedition, Chevrolet Suburban, or GMC Yukon.
• Need a tire that’s exceptional in longevity (9.9 vs 9.1).
• Need a tire that’s better in traction (8.5 vs 8.4).
• Need a tire that’s better in handling (8.4 vs 8.3).
• Need a tire that controls noise levels better on highways.
• Need a tire that’s specially optimized for heavy-duty hauling.

On the other hand, you should choose the Hankook Dynapro HT2 (RH14) if you:

• Drive a versatile truck, utility van, or crossover like the Nissan Titan, RAM 1500, or Toyota Sequoia.
• Need a tire that’s considered an O.E. replacement choice for many vehicles on the market.
• Need a tire that absorbs road vibrations better for a comfortable driving experience.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help, as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.