Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV

Japanese tire maker Yokohama is a reliable tire manufacturer offering world-class products in categories like all-season, all-terrain, mud-terrain, winter, and UHP. On the other hand, the Finnish brand, Nokian is a renowned winter tire manufacturer and is the only tire maker in the world to hold a permanent winter tire testing facility. Besides winter tires, Nokian also produces all-season and all-weather tires as well for passenger cars, CUVs, SUVs, and light trucks.

Engineered for CUVs and SUVs, the Yokohama Geolandar CV 4S and Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV are all-weather tires, which offer superior performance year-round on dry, wet, and moderate to severe winter weather conditions. With unique tread patterns, the tires feature deep grooves, multiple sipes, special tread compounds, and Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certificates ensuring superior winter performance. So, which one is the best between the two? Let’s compare Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV based on our internal scoring system, SimpleScore to know which is the best tire between the two.

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S tires

Debuting in 2023, the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S features an innovative tread pattern and a new rubber compound that offers improved performance year-round and a longer tread life. The Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification assures excellent winter performance in snow and ice. Thanks to the optimized tread design, the Geolandar CV4S is quiet and returns a comfortable ride quality. The four-zigzag grooves allow quick water and slush evacuation from the tread to mitigate the risk of hydroplaning and boost snow traction, while the optimized lugged grooves enhance wet and snow performance. Backed by a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, the reinforced construction and solid sidewall design of the Yokohama boost its durability and longevity.

Boasting a score of 8.7 out of 10, the Geolandar CV4S promises enhanced grip, traction, and handling along with longer tread life.

Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV tires

The all-weather tire from Nokian, the Nordman Solstice Directional CUV features a directional tread pattern for fantastic traction and handling in dry, wet, and moderate to severe snow. Offering great year-round performance, the Nokian tire has a special tread pattern that allows quick water and slush dispersal to avoid the risk of hydroplaning and improve wet and snow performance. The Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified tire assures excellent grip, traction, steering response, and stability in extreme winter weather conditions. While the low rolling design of the Nordman Solstice Directional CUV boosts fuel efficiency, its all-weather tread resists uneven wear and promotes uniform wear throughout the tread life for increased longevity. It is backed by a 50,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.

With an 8.7 SimpleScore, the Nokian tire is a reliable player for all-season traction, grip, handling, stability, and longer service life.

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV on traction

The ability of a tire to remain in contact with the ground without skidding is known as traction. It forms the basis of the performance of a tire in dry, wet, and wintry conditions. The Yoko and Nokian both promise adequate traction throughout the year.

With a traction score of 8.5, the new rubber compound of the Geolandar CV4S boosts traction around the year in dry, wet, and moderate to severe winter weather conditions. While the asymmetric tread design provides necessary traction and improves steering response with an ideal groove-to-void ratio, the optimized lug grooves quickly remove water and slush from the tread to resist the chances of aquaplaning. The Yokohama tire comes with the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification for enhanced performance in extreme winter conditions.

Scoring an 8.7 in traction, the Nordman Solstice Directional CUV features a directional tread pattern with dense zigzag sipes and block edges for extra traction on snowy and wet surfaces. The deep and wide grooves not only expel slush and water quickly out of the contact patch but also ensure increased grip and traction in treacherous conditions. The Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified tire assures improved snow performance in severe winter weather.

Being the specialist in winter tires that demand extra grip, the Nokian wins the traction battle in a close contest.

ADVANTAGE: Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV on handling

In wet and snow, controlling a vehicle becomes the most important aspect; hence, handling is the second most critical aspect of a tire.

With a handling score of 8.6, the Yokohama tire features an asymmetric tread pattern, which not only boosts traction but also returns precise steering response and stability thanks to the large contact area on the outside and ribbed pattern on the central patch. The use of advanced tread compound with micro silica boosts traction and handling year-round in dry, wet, and moderate to severe winter conditions.

Achieving a fantastic handling score of 8.7 out of 10, the Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV delivers accurate steering response thanks to the dense sipe-laden directional tread pattern. The optimized tread design not only lowers rolling resistance for increased fuel efficiency but also boosts handling on dry, wet, and snowy surfaces.

Although marginally, the Nokian wins the handling section, too, leading the race 2-0.

ADVANTAGE: Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV on longevity

The longer the service life of a tire, the more the chances of drivers choosing it. This makes longevity a key selling point among tires. The Geolandar CV4S and Nordman Solstice Directional CUV both promise longer tread life.

Riding on the new rubber compound that limits uneven wear and promotes uniform wear, the Yokohama scores an excellent 9 out of 10 for longevity. Hundreds of 3D sipes not only provide traction and grip but also aid in improving the tread life of the Geolandar CV4S by enhancing tread rigidity. Lastly, it is backed by the 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.

Scoring 8.7 in longevity, the Nokian features a durable rubber compound and a unique tread pattern that promotes excellent wearability and resists uneven wear. The patented driving safety indicator on the tread belt alerts drivers about the groove depth left, allowing them to change the tire whenever required. The all-weather tire is backed by a 50,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.

Atlas, the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S marks its first win in the comparison.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV4S

When to use each

All-season tires are used for year-round performance in dry, wet, and light snow, however, sudden weather changes may catch it unguarded. Here come the all-weather tires that offer similar performance throughout the year with the added advantage of excellent performance in moderate to severe winter weather conditions. Both come with a decent limited manufacturer tread life warranty.

If your SUV is driven more in tough conditions of rocks, gravel, mud, or sand, you should opt for dedicated all-terrain tires that offer superior performance in off-road conditions and adequate performance on paved roads. Mud terrain tires are great for extreme muddy terrains as they feature deep grooves and lugged tread pattern for consistent traction in slippery conditions.

Which one should you choose?

To sum up, both tires score 8.7 out of 10 in their overall SimpleScore. However, their individual section scores may be a better option to judge their true capabilities. If you want great traction and handling, the Nokian is the ideal tire to go for while if you prefer long-lasting tires the Yokohama is the go-to tire. Both tire makers offer a 30-day satisfaction trial on a set of four tires.

Looking at their prices for a tire size 245/55R19, the Yokohama costs $240 per tire and $960 for four tires. Contrarily, the Nokian costs $189 per tire, and for four, it’s $756. The difference between the two is $204!

Based on the SimpleScore, you should opt for the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S if you:

• Drive vehicles like Mazda 6, Buick Regal, Audi A4-allroad, and Chevrolet Malibu
• Prefer tires that last long (9.0 vs 8.7)
• Want a more prominent brand
• Prefer Japanese technology

On the other hand, the Nokian Nordman Solstice Directional CUV should be your choice if you:

• Drive vehicles like Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon, and Land Rover Range Rover Sport
• Prefer better traction (8.7 vs 8.5) and handling (8.7 vs 8.6)
• Want a proven winter performance brand
• Prefer Finnish technology

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.