Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Kumho Solus HA32 tires

Extra grip is always welcome during snow, ice, and slush, but it is not available on all-season tires. This has prompted manufacturers to come up with all-weather tires, a category that lies between all-season and winter tires. Such tires are designed for increased grip during moderate to severe winters without compromising traction during the rest of the year.

Common features on the best all-weather tires include more aggressive tread patterns, revised tread formulas, improved siping patterns, and others for confidence in mud and snow. The aim of this comparison is to pit the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S against the Kumho Solus HA32 and come up with the best tire as per your needs. By following a unique grading system called.

SimpleScore, we at SimpleTire provide you with an overview of a tire’s capabilities as per traction, longevity, handling, and an overall average score.

Both tires are designed for comfortable rides and feature a Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification for severe winter service. While the Geolandar CV4S is fitted into CUVs and SUVs, the Solus HA32 has been specially designed for various passenger cars. To know more about why you should choose one over the other, read this Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Kumho Solus HA32 tires comparison till the end.

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S tires

There may be comparable tires created by top tire manufacturers like Pirelli and Bridgestone that are more expensive, but Japanese tire manufacturer Yokohama provides high-quality tires across different categories. Designed for SUVs and CUVs, the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S boasts a strong and long-lasting construction that enhances its lifespan. You can expect the combination of improved performance and agility with a smooth and pleasant ride.

While the high tread depth and intricate tread design of this tire help generate great traction, its robust internal construction leads to a long tread life. Yokohama has computer-tuned and randomly distributed tread pattern for increased comfort and less noise. An attractive mileage warranty is available here, details of which will be discussed further in this comparison. Based on the above, the Geolandar CV4S receives an 8.7 on our SimpleScore charts.

Kumho Solus HA32 tires

Kumho Solus HA32 is ahead of its time with a bunch of new features and innovations. This all-weather tire showcases a distinctive V-shaped directional tread and angled grooves that make it appropriate for American roads and even Nordic conditions, pushing slush and water away from its contact patch and preventing aquaplaning. Consistent winter traction, reduced stopping distances, longer wear life, and less environmental impact are all benefits of the newly created pine resin tread compound. The tread's center blocks are connected by 3D slope tie-bars, which improve straight-line road manners, cornering ability, and rigidity.

To provide the driver with a head start on treadwear during winter performance, the treads have hourglass wear indicators molded into them. While 3D sipes are responsible for effective dry and wet traction, Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification provides severe winter performance and grip. Armed with a higher traction score, the Solus HA32, which has a traction rating of 8.9 on SimpleScore, is covered by a suitable limited manufacturer's tread life warranty from Kumho. If you're shopping for a trustworthy set of all-weather tires, the Kumho Solus HA32 is a great pick, receiving an overall SimpleScore of 8.7.

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Kumho Solus HA32 tires on traction

The objective of fitting an all-weather tire instead of an all-season tire on a CUV, sedan, SUV, or minivan is to easily negotiate through moderate to heavy snow and ice, as the latter is suitable only for light snow. Both the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and the Kumho Solus HA32 feature the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol rating that enables them to confidently grip surfaces with moderate to heavy snow and ice. While the Geolandar CV4S showcases an advanced tread design, its tread depth is noticeably higher than that of the Solus HA32.

Although the Geolandar CV4S features an asymmetric tread pattern and the Solus HA32 showcases a directional pattern, the combination of tread depths and tread compound properties brings the scores closer together, as does the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification. Both tires were given traction scores of 8.5.

We found a pine resin-infused tread compound, a directional all-weather tread, and 3D sipes on the Kumho Solus HA32. On the other hand, there are 3D sipes and optimized lug grooves on the Geolandar CV4S for enhancing traction.

Customer reviews are most helpful when there is a narrow disparity between SimpleScore ratings.

ADVANTAGE: Tie

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Kumho Solus HA32 tires on handling

For optimal wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance, Yokohama developed the Geolandar CV4S. Available in H, T, and V speed ratings, it displays slightly deeper tread depth compared to the Solus HA32. A new polymer blend has been used to enhance performance and traction on the Geolandar CV4S. With an impressive handling score of 8.6, this tire demonstrates an excellent combination of versatility and performance.

Here we have another close call: the handling category sees a SimpleScore of 8.8 for the Kumho. To be fair, neither of these tires showcases the handling dynamics, cornering capability, or steering reaction of an Ultra-high-performance (UHP) tire as their scores are below 9. Tires with stiff sidewalls, reinforced shoulders, and tread designs provide agility and responsive steering, and both are highly capable and agile when it comes to handling. H, V, and W are the speed ratings available for this tire and an innovative. While natural compounds make the tire environment-friendly and enhance braking, performance wear indicators help monitor tire performance.

ADVANTAGE: Kumho Solus HA32

Yokohama Geolandar CV4SC vs Kumho Solus HA32 tires on longevity

Longevity is one area where Yokohama has an edge over Kumho, though only just. Both tires are available with a standard 60,000 mile limited manufacturer warranty. Advanced construction, triple 3D sipes, and higher tread depth for the Yokohama stand out. On the other hand, the Kumho counters well with 3D interlocking sipes and performance wear indicators. Sipes on both tires are responsible for reducing uneven wear.

Based on the above, the Yokohama receives a 9.0 and the Kumho gets an 8.9 in terms of longevity scores.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV4S

When to use each

Both the Geolandar CV4S and the Solus HA32 are Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified, showing their great abilities to function well at temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit and in deep snow. However, do remember that these are not winter tires, which means you will not benefit if there is excessive snow for more than 6 months in your area. Both asymmetrical and directional tread patterns on the tires are effective for grip on dry and wet surfaces. If we go by customer reviews, we see that Yokohama has more reviews in favor of the Geolandar CV4S.

With all-weather tires like the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and the Kumho Solus HA32, you will not have to worry about storage space.

Which one should you choose?

Competition between the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and the Kumho Solus HA 32 is as close as it can get. While the two tires are tied on traction, Kumho surges ahead in handling and is beaten by the Yokohama in longevity. To bring the tires into a better perspective, we would like to show you their starting prices. The Geolandar CV4S begins at $167.99 ($671.96 for 4) and the Solus HA32 costs $102 per tire ($306 for 4).

To summarize, we have the following reasons for purchasing the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S:

• More faith in the Yokohama brand
• Better wet traction
• Better performance with the newest polymer blend

You must consider the Kumho Solus HA32 for the following reasons:

• Better handling
• Advanced construction leads to better year-round comfort
• More affordable tire

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.