GT Radial Komodo MT Plus vs Maxxis Razr MT-772 tires

Last updated 6/27/2024 - Originally published 6/27/2024
Written by SimpleTire

Mud-terrain tires are constantly subjected to heavy strain, especially in off-road areas. Therefore, it pays to own a tire of this category that features a limited manufacturer tread life warranty. Warranty is one of the major points of difference when we set out to compare the GT Radial Komodo MT Plus against the Maxxis Razr MT-772. Interestingly, both the Indonesian Giti (makers of GT Radial tires) and the Taiwanese Maxxis are known to have started by making bicycle tires and inner tubes. Both offer symmetrical tread patterns and the same tread depths, but the Maxxis tires provide a higher ply rating. To see which of these tires is better suited for your Jeep, SUV, or light truck, go through this Komodo MT Plus vs Razr MT-772 tires comparison in detail.

GT Radial Komodo MT Plus tires

The GT Radial Komodo MT Plus is definitely the more good-looking tire, featuring a stylish white letter sidewall. It is a great tire for serious off-roading, with the use of maximum traction, great handling, control, and traction over rocky and muddy terrain. The tough Komodo MT Plus is a great choice for Jeeps, light trucks, and SUVs that withstand abuse from the most difficult off-road situations. This tire scores an average SimpleScore rating of 8.2 on a scale of 10.

Maxxis Razr MT-772 tires

As a mud-terrain tire, the GT Radial Maxxis Razr MT-772 has been designed with an aggressive tread pattern, both on top of the tire and on its sidewall. The availability of a 10-ply rating means that it is strong enough to carry very heavy loads without losing shape and the strength can easily be gauged from its reinforced Armour sidewall design. With such a sidewall, you would not have to worry about cuts as it offers drivers increased puncture resistance.

This tire has been made using a special compound with different features and there are mud and stone ejectors for self-cleaning, thereby leading to consistent traction. Unlike the Komodo MT Plus, the Razr MT-772 is available with a limited manufacturer tread life warranty. Apart from the above, you are likely to find these tires to be surprisingly quiet on regular tarred surfaces. The Razr MT-772 earns an 8.3 SimpleScore rating.

GT Radial Komodo MT Plus vs Maxxis Razr MT-772 tires on traction

Mud-terrain tires have the ability to offer maximum grip even when the air pressure is low. While considering these tires, you’ll find the GT Radial Komodo MT Plus loaded in terms of features, offering drivers zigzag grooves with stone ejectors and robust interlocking tread blocks. At an average traction SimpleScore of 8.0, the Komodo MT Plus was found marginally better than the Razr MT-772.

Compared to the above, deep center blocks and mud and stone ejectors prevent debris from getting stuck in the Maxxis Razr MT-772 as it covers muddy and other off-road terrain. Compared to such a tire, the lug spacings on a mud-terrain like this will be closer together, leading to a better balance between on and off-road traction. Despite the compound being relatively soft, it is still able to work magic on rocky terrain, resulting in an average traction SimpleScore of 7.9.

ADVANTAGE: GT Radial Komodo MT Plus

GT Radial Komodo MT Plus vs Maxxis Razr MT-772 tires on durability

The GT Radial Komodo MT Plus is made using stone ejectors that protect its casing, which, in turn, resists cuts, punctures, and scuffs to ensure high durability. However, it comes with a 6-ply rating that allows it to carry lesser weights than the Maxxis Razr MT-772. A full nylon cap ply reinforces steel belts for higher strength and durability, resulting in an average durability SimpleScore of 8.0.

On the other hand, the Razr MT-772 features a dual-cord casing ply that enhances durability and toughness. This is a tire with a 10-ply rating that is most useful when carrying weights is the main objective. Stone and mud ejectors for increased durability are also present here, and the tire is suitable for an average durability SimpleScore of 8.2.

ADVANTAGE: Maxxis Razr MT-772

GT Radial Komodo MT Plus vs Maxxis Razr MT-772 tires on longevity

The GT Radial tires feature rim protectors in their sidewalls that protect tires and wheels from damage, leading to longer tread life. Both tires feature new tread compounds that boost tear and puncture resistance. However, the tread compounds on the Razr MT-772 comprise chemical fillers that maximize tread life, resulting in an average longevity SimpleScore of 8.7.

In contrast, the Razr MT-772’s sidewall design provides tremendous strength for longer tread life. As mentioned above, this is the tire with a limited manufacturer tread life warranty of 40,000 miles. We feel confident while administering this tire with an average longevity SimpleScore of 9.0.

ADVANTAGE: Maxxis Razr MT-772

When to use each

When you intend to carry heavier loads, it would be wiser to make use of the Maxxis Razr MT-772. If the plan is to experience moderate off-road performance but with a stylish tire, consider buying the GT Radial Komodo MT Plus. Speed will not be a factor as both tires feature the same Q-speed rating. The Maxxis tire wins this duel in 2 out of 3 parameters.

Which one should you choose?

With regards to prices, here’s how the two tires stack up. While the Komodo MT Plus begins at roughly $134 per tire ($536 for 4), the Razr MT-772 is available at a starting price of approximately $204 per tire ($816 for 4).

Your reasons to buy the GT Komodo MT Plus should include the following:

  • It is the cheaper tire
  • It provides better traction
  • The sidewall looks better

On the other hand, here’s why you should choose the Maxxis Razr MT-772:

  • Lasts longer
  • Offers a limited manufacturer tread life warranty
  • Tougher and stronger
  • Can carry heavier loads

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By