Compare

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires

Last updated 7/16/2024 - Originally published 7/16/2024
Written by SimpleTire

Bridgestone Potenza Sport AS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS Plus tires

Bridgestone and Yokohama are two leading tire manufacturers that started their journey from Japan. While Bridgestone was established in 1931 and has its headquarters in Kyobashi, Japan, Yokohama was founded in 1917 and is based in Tokyo.

Both tire manufacturers are known for their innovative tread designs and technologies. Additionally, they put a lot of research, time, and effort into making its tires outstanding on the performance front. The Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S and the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus are two of the highly calibrating UHP all-season tires that align and incorporate their respective manufacturer’s legacy and advancements in tire manufacturing. These tires are suitable for use on passenger, performance, and sports cars, and are built to offer an exhilarating driving experience year-round.

There is no doubt that both of these tires deliver great performance, but for a UHP, all-season tire buyer who plans to choose either of these two tires, there has to be one out of these tires that is better. So, using SimpleScore, let’s compare Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires to find out where each tire excels and understand which one could be the right choice for you.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S tires

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S

Introduced on September 6, 2023, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S is an Ultra-High-Performance (UHP), all-season tire that features a performance-oriented asymmetric tread design and is suitable for use on sports cars, sedans, and performance crossovers that have 16- to 20-inch rim diameters. The tire is designed for superior performance year-round and offers confident handling and responsive grip to provide a sporty driving experience in rain, snow, and shiny weather conditions. The Potenza Sport A/S tire utilizes many great features and technologies that contribute to driving thrill and enhance performance in warmer, wet, and mild wintry conditions.

Overall, the Potenza Sport A/S scores an excellent 9.1 SimpleScore rating on a scale of 10 because of its excellent traction performance, outstanding handling, and longer tread life.

Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires

Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus

The Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus made its debut on October 1, 2019, and sports an innovative asymmetric tread pattern that has multiple elements to boost performance. The tire is engineered to meet the fitment needs of luxury vehicles, high-end performance cars, sports cars, and American muscle cars. Irrespective of the season, you enjoy the exceptional handling and braking performance, when the Advan Sport A/S Plus tires are mounted on wheels. It is suitable for use on the above-mentioned vehicle types having rim diameters varying between 16 to 21 inches. Additionally, the tire boasts technologies that promote longevity, enhanced traction performance, and long-lasting tread life.

Overall, the Advan Sport A/S Plus scores an impressive 8.8 out of 10 SimpleScore rating, thanks to its solid traction performance, better handling response, and excellent tread life.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on traction

Typically, the UHP tires are made for use in warmer weather, but both the tires that we have picked for comparison come with an additional advantage of being able to perform in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. No performance-oriented tire can be called great if it doesn’t offer good traction performance and this is because traction is the one key area that indicates if the tire can maintain surefootedness with the surface and contribute to a thrilling high-speed driving experience. So, let’s check out how are these tires on the traction front.

The Potenza Sport A/S boasts an excellent 9.3 out of 10 SimpleScore in traction and comes with an all-season tread compound and an advanced asymmetric tread design that has elements that ensure optimum traction performance in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. The slot alignment and open shoulders of the tire increase water evacuation and improve wet weather performance, whereas the full-depth 3D ultra-thin sipes provide multiple biting edges to increase grip and traction in light winter conditions. Additionally, the wider contact patch and flat footprint further enhance the traction performance of the Potenza Sport A/S.

On the other hand, the Advan Sport A/S Plus has a score of 8.8 out of 10 in traction. This is because of the tire’s advanced all-season HS-2 compound that features high-grade silica for improved contact with the surface. The tire also sports Z-shaped grooves and wavy sipes that provide multiple biting edges for increased wet and winter traction. The footprint of the tire is wider and gets detailed elements to offer solid traction performance in dry, wet, and light winter traction.

When it comes to traction, the Potenza Sport A/S has a slight edge over the Advan Sport A/S Plus.

ADVANTAGE: Potenza Sport A/S

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on handling

Along with traction, it is handling that is very crucial for drivers of UHP, all-season tires as it is related to the vehicle’s turning ability, acceleration, and high-speed stability. The good thing is that both Bridgestone and Yokohama have ensured that these tires do not compromise on the handling part.

The Potenza Sport A/S sports a 9.3 SimpleScore for handling, which is achieved mainly because of the tire’s solid rib design that improves handling and reduces pattern noise. Additionally, the full-depth 3D ultra-thin sipes of the tire also improve handling performance in wet and wintry conditions. Thanks to the reinforced shoulders and the center rib, this tire offers exceptional steering response and provides drivers greater confidence to maneuver seamlessly and change lanes.

Contrarily, the Advan Sport A/S has an 8.7 SimpleScore rating for handling, which is largely driven by the extra-large shoulder blocks that improve cornering performance and the optimized sidewall construction that ensures crisp, responsive handling. Moreover, the silica-rich HS-2 compound also provides greater confidence to the drivers by improving braking performance in wet and wintry conditions. The tire sports a wider contact patch that further provides better control and keeps the steering response appropriate.

No doubt the handling performance of the Advan Sport A/S Plus is great, it is slightly behind the Potenza Sport A/S.

ADVANTAGE: Potenza Sport A/S

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus tires on longevity

The ultra-high-performance, all-season tires are meant for faster accelerations, instant brakings, sharp turnings, and exhilarating performance. As these tires are used for thrilling drives, they are more prone to wear, and therefore, as a buyer, you would not want something that wears too quickly. That’s where longevity plays a crucial role! Let’s analyze how long-lasting are these tires.

The Potenza Sport A/S has a SimpleScore of 8.8 out of 10 in longevity. Thanks to the new-gen tread compound that incorporates the patented PeakLife Polymer Technology to resist driving pressures and faster accelerations and extend the tire’s tread life. In addition, the tire’s flat contact patch and optimally arranged solid tread blocks help in achieving even and slower wear. Bridgestone offers the Potenza Sport A/S with a 50,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty. This further indicates that the tire is built to last longer by the Japanese tire giant.

The Advan Sport A/S Plus scores an excellent 9.1 SimpleScore rating in longevity, which means the tire can serve longer. All thanks to the flatter contour profile that optimizes the contact patch and distributes driving pressure for longer and even wear. The HS-2 compound is another highlight when it comes to longevity as it further extends the tire’s service life. This tire is offered with 55,000 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty for non-staggered and front-position staggered fitments, whereas the rear-position staggered fitment variations of this tire are offered with 27,500 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty. You can learn from the offered tread life warranty that this tire is also engineered to serve for a longer tenure.

Longevity was the area where we noticed things got interesting and though the Bridgestone tire had a decent SimpleScore rating, it was the Yokohama tire that surpassed!

ADVANTAGE: Advan Sport A/S Plus

When to use each

The Potenza Sport A/S tires and the Advan Sport A/S Plus tires are both ultra-high-performance tires that come with year-round usability. Whether it is dry, wet, or light snow conditions, these tires are engineered to deliver exceptional handling, acceleration, and stability. This is because of the advanced compounds, innovative features, and cutting-edge technologies these manufacturers utilize in making these tires.

However, these tires aren’t made for use in moderate to severe winter weather as they are not Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified. Furthermore, these tires shouldn’t be used on rough roads as they are suited for paved roads and tracks.

Before making a purchase, make sure that you match your vehicle’s rim size with the tire that you prefer buying out of these two.

Which one should you choose?

Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus

So, now with everything about these tires analyzed in detail, you must be wondering which UHP, all-season tire is best for your drive. When comparing the overall SimpleScores of both tires, we found that the Bridgestone Potenza Sport A/S was slightly ahead of the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S Plus with an overall score of 9.1 vs 8.8. But, it must be learned that these tires differ from each other in various areas and therefore, they must be weighed against each other to evaluate which one is the right pick for you.

When it comes to pricing, the Potenza Sport A/S is available at a starting price of at least $179.99 per tire, while the Advan Sport A/S Plus comes at a starting price of at least $135.99 per tire. This means that a set of four Potenza Sport A/S tires will cost you at least $719.96, while a set of four Advan Sport A/S Plus tires will cost you at least $543.96.

Based on SimpleScore, you should choose the Bridgestone Potenza Sport if you:

  • Drive a luxury sedan like the Maserati Ghibli, a small luxury SUV like the BMW X3, a compact coupe like the Subaru BRZ, or a coupe like the Ford Mustang GT.
  • Need UHP, all-season tires that offer better traction performance (9.3 vs 8.8).
  • Need tires that offer better handling performance (9.3 vs 8.7).
  • Are okay with paying a higher amount to experience better overall performance
  • Need tires that come with a decent warranty coverage across the size lineup

Conversely, you should consider the Advan Sport A/S Plus if you:

  • Drive a performance-oriented hatchback like the Volkswagen Golf GTI, an older convertible like the Mercedes-Benz SL500, or a sports car Chevrolet Corvette.
  • Need tires that are long-lasting (9.1 vs 8.8).
  • Need tires that come with better warranty coverage for non-staggered and front-position staggered fitments.
  • Want value-for-money tires that offer a good performance and control and come at a very low price than the Bridgestones

While the Potenza Sport A/S vs Advan Sport A/S Plus tires might not look like a close comparison at first glance, the above analysis clearly shows that they are two close competitors. It must be learned that these tires have their advantages and the decision to buy one of them should be made based on the vehicle you drive, where and how you drive, and what is more important for you out of traction, handling, longevity, and pricing.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By